Honestly,
is there anything more insufferable than 24-hour news channels?
If
you’ve never had that experience, 24 Hour news is just a continuous loop of the
same headlines, the same reports, the same graphics, the same adverts, the same
tickertape words running across the screen and on and on and on. Once you’ve
watched about… 20 minutes of it you’ve pretty well had enough.
But just
occasionally, the tedium, the slow drip torture, is interrupted and your
will to live returns. These are the moments when the words “breaking news”
flash on the screen and the presenter says, “We’re going to leave that story
now because we are getting reports coming in that the trapped miners in Chile
have been found alive… or the Palace has announced that Prince William and Kate
Middleton are to marry… or a breakthrough new cure has been found for some
disease…”
Breaking
news is a sudden jolt to the droning information cycle and that’s what Luke
chapter 24 is all about. It's on page 1002 of the church Bibles so it would be
good to turn to it. And while you're finding the page, let me ask you a
question.
Have
you ever wondered what sort of literature the Gospels are?
Nobody
quite knows where to situate the 4 Gospels as a literary category.
They
are not quite biographies because they miss so much out. They are highly
selective accounts. John tells us this in the last verse of his Gospel; “Jesus
did many other things as well. If every one of them were written down, I
suppose that even the whole world would not have room for the books that would
be written.” So these are not biographies.
They
are certainly not fiction; they are accurate historical records, properly
researched and sourced from eye witness testimony. Some people have pointed out
occasional superficial differences between them as you wold expect. If you were
to read about last week’s Budget in the Mirror, the Guardian, the Telegraph and
the Economist you would get quite different views I suspect but closer
examination would reveal that they are consistent.
So
the Gospels aren’t fiction. But they are not really histories either. Again
they omit so much detail. One half of Mark’s Gospel covers over three years and
one half is centred on just one week. So they aren’t history books in the way
we do historical studies today.
There
is no exact literary equivalent to the Gospels. There is nothing else in all
literature quite like them. The nearest thing we do have in our culture is
extended news bulletins; they are news reports (breaking news,
in fact) but – because they are extended reports, they give you a lot of
background to the story as well as the main item.
And
the big headline event that accounts for why the Gospels were written down is
the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead.
If
that had never happened, Jesus of Nazareth would have probably have gone down
in the footnotes of history as an original communicator, a gifted illusionist
and a failed religious reformer. My guess is most of us here would never have
heard of him.
But
the resurrection changes everything and provides the proof of who he is.
Like
a breaking news item on a dreary day at CNN, no one was expecting it.
“On
the first day of the week, very early in the morning, the women took the spices
they had prepared and went to the tomb.”
All
four gospels are agreed; these women made their way to the tomb very early in
the day, as dawn was breaking. Sunrise at this time of year in Jerusalem is
about 5:30am.
As they left for the tomb, they were anticipating doing what they had not had time to do on the Friday – as sun set, marking the beginning of the Sabbath.
They were expecting a guarded tomb with the stone in place, which would need to
be rolled open so that they could wash and embalm Jesus’ body.
The first surprise was that (v2) the stone was already out of place. The second surprise (v3) was that, when they looked in, there was no body there.
So v4 says they were wondering about this.
What
did they wonder?
Did
we go to the wrong tomb? No, this was the one.
So
why is the body not there? Perhaps it is being embalmed elsewhere?
But
why would anyone do that?
And
anyway, who moved it?
Maybe
we can look around and ask if anyone knows anything more?
Perhaps
there’s a…
Third
surprise! Suddenly! “Two men in clothes that gleamed like lightning stood
beside them” (v4).
In
fact, surprise is not quite strong enough. Verse 5 says “in their fright the
women bowed down…” The men did more than make them jump. There was something
eerie, something strange about them.
And
then the fourth - and greatest surprise (v4-5). “Why do you look
for the living among the dead? He is not here; he has risen! Remember how
he told you, while he was still with you in Galilee: ‘The Son of Man must be
delivered over to the hands of sinners, be crucified and on the third day [Friday,
Saturday, Sunday…] be raised again.’”
And
so the women, dazed, perplexed, still working out what it all meant, but
strangely excited, make their way back to break the news to the men that
something has rather messed up their plans for the day.
I’d
love to have been a fly on the wall.
“What
are you doing here?”
“He
said it. He said he would be raised when we were in Galilee!”
“What?”
“Yes,
after three days Friday, Saturday, Sunday!”
“Have
you done the embalming already?”
“Yes!
No! We did go. Two men were there.”
“Two men?
Oh, good grief, no, there was only one body in the tomb. Can you believe it,
they’ve only gone to a grave with two bodies in it. Women have no sense of
direction!”
“No!
He is risen!”
“What
do you mean… risen?
“The
men. They said so.”
“Oh,
talking skeletons now is it? You just couldn’t make this up.”
“No!
He is not in the tomb. Two men told us that Jesus has risen.”
We’re told that the men “did not believe the women, because their words
seemed to them like nonsense.”
But
Peter (v12) “got up and ran to the tomb. Bending over, he saw the strips of
linen lying by themselves, and he went away, wondering to himself what had
happened.”
What
did he wonder?
- Could it be that the women are right?
- So where is he now?
- Hang on. Is this a practical joke? Candid Camera?
- But he did talk about rising didn’t he?
- Whenever you get breaking news, as soon as it’s possible to do so, the news reporters interview eye witnesses and commentators to try and get different perspectives on the story.
“So
there’s going to be a royal wedding. What do you think?”
“I
think it’s wonderful, I can’t wait.”
“I
think when you’ve got hospitals closing down, it’s a waste of public money.”
“I
think it’s so important for the country to celebrate.”
“I
think it’s terrible for my business that we have another bank holiday.”
There’s
nothing like a good argument to break up the tedium of 24 Hour News…
In
the early church there were arguments too. There were disagreements.
The
Bible tells us that they quarrelled forcefully about food distribution to
widows.
They
had heated disagreements about whether or not to include Gentiles in the
church.
Two
key leaders, Paul and Barnabas, had an embarrassing public spat over whether to
allow John Mark to go on mission with them because he had deserted the team the
last time.
Oh,
the first century church could make the Church of England look like a picnic in
paradise.
But
that church, whatever it squabbled about, was absolutely united and in complete
agreement from the very earliest days about the one issue that was most
difficult to believe and most likely to cause disagreement; that Jesus of
Nazareth had risen from the dead.
No
one in the earliest Christian communities disputed it. No one said “Hang on a
minute, a dead man coming to life? This doesn’t quite add up.” There were no
major bust ups or emergency councils or big divisions about the resurrection of
Christ from the dead. It was the one thing everyone agreed about – such was its
status as established fact.
And
that, my dear friends is… Hold on..! We’re interrupting this sermon because
news is just breaking of several confirmed sightings of a man who was executed
on Friday. We’re going live now to our Middle East correspondent. Over to you,
Luke…
Sermon preached at All Saints' Preston on Tees, 31st March 2013
No comments:
Post a Comment